On Nov 7, 2009, at 20:59 , Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > A 1.1 alpha under construction is great. When do underscores > appear, especially in class names? I thought I saw that creeping > forward, and want to register my encouragement of any effort to have > that appear in 1.1. Ok, I'll stop nagging :)
It shouldn't be hard to do in 1.1. I discussed with Lukas today and one open question is whether we want to enforce _ not being a valid assignment already in 1.0. I fear a bit that people will complain because they have to fix their code before being able to load it into Pharo. Does anybody see a problem with this? From the previous discussion I understand that most people would favor the change. But is 1.0 too early? > > For 1.0, I'm still stuck by the SharedQueue2 problem. I cannot load > the sequencable collection fixes into either RC image - I thought I > might be able to load it into RC1-dev and then file out the needed > pieces into RC1-web, but no-go :( Can you also try to load your code into a core image? The update I did yesterday includes the SharedQueue2 fixes. Please let us know if it does not fix the problem. Adrian > > Bill > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected] > ] On Behalf Of Adrian Lienhard > Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 2:38 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] prebuilt 1.1 #11035 > > Yes, we have a 1.0 and a 1.1 stream now (actually since the sprint > in Lille). > > I'm integrating remaining critical fixes for 1.0, while Stef and the > other integrators have started working on 1.1. I don't think it's > too early at all. It allows us to keep the pace to move forward with > new stuff, while stabilizing and afterwards maintaining the 1.0 > release. > > Just as a reminder, here are the main goals we have set for 1.1: > > - New preferences system > - Integrate Alien > - Improve code quality (e.g., make selected Lint tests pass) > - Continuous integration system > > (http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Milestones) > > Cheers, > Adrian > > On Nov 7, 2009, at 20:15 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > >> mmmmmmm are we already in 1.1 alpha ??? isn't it to early ? >> >> Best >> >> Mariano >> >> On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> http://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/24734/PharoCore-1.1-11035- >>> alp >>> ha.zip >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
