Adrian,

That's in

   www.squeaksource.com/Pharo/

??  I think I found it, and it loaded(!!!) :)  Time for a run, then I will 
retry the RC1 build.

Bill


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adrian 
Lienhard
Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 4:39 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] prebuilt 1.1 #11035

Hi Bill,

On Nov 7, 2009, at 21:23 , Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:

> Adrian,
>
> Whatever you guys think about underscores timing is fine by me.   
> From my own perspective, there is no "too soon" but there might be for 
> others.
>
> My code is unlikely to load in the core.  Since the slice fixing
> SharedQueue2 was marked depdendent on sequenceable collection fixes 
> that I can't load, I'm hesitant to get overly creative.  I suppose I 
> could try loading the web image install script into a core image to 
> see if it runs in a reasonable time.

Yes, the slice has quite some other changes. I just picked the three methods 
that were added to SharedQueue2. If you want to try out these changes, you can 
load Collection-Sequenceable-AdrianLienhard.39 from the Pharo repository into 
your image.

Adrian

>
> Bill
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]
> ] On Behalf Of Adrian Lienhard
> Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 3:12 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] prebuilt 1.1 #11035
>
>
> On Nov 7, 2009, at 20:59 , Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
>
>> A 1.1 alpha under construction is great.  When do underscores appear, 
>> especially in class names?  I thought I saw that creeping forward, 
>> and want to register my encouragement of any effort to have that 
>> appear in 1.1.  Ok, I'll stop nagging :)
>
> It shouldn't be hard to do in 1.1. I discussed with Lukas today and 
> one open question is whether we want to enforce _ not being a valid 
> assignment already in 1.0. I fear a bit that people will complain 
> because they have to fix their code before being able to load it into 
> Pharo. Does anybody see a problem with this? From the previous 
> discussion I understand that most people would favor the change. But 
> is 1.0 too early?
>
>>
>> For 1.0, I'm still stuck by the SharedQueue2 problem.  I cannot load 
>> the sequencable collection fixes into either RC image - I thought I 
>> might be able to load it into RC1-dev and then file out the needed 
>> pieces into RC1-web, but no-go :(
>
> Can you also try to load your code into a core image? The update I did 
> yesterday includes the SharedQueue2 fixes. Please let us know if it 
> does not fix the problem.
>
> Adrian
>
>>
>> Bill
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]
>> ] On Behalf Of Adrian Lienhard
>> Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 2:38 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] prebuilt 1.1 #11035
>>
>> Yes, we have a 1.0 and a 1.1 stream now (actually since the sprint in 
>> Lille).
>>
>> I'm integrating remaining critical fixes for 1.0, while Stef and the 
>> other integrators have started working on 1.1. I don't think it's too 
>> early at all. It allows us to keep the pace to move forward with new 
>> stuff, while stabilizing and afterwards maintaining the 1.0 release.
>>
>> Just as a reminder, here are the main goals we have set for 1.1:
>>
>> - New preferences system
>> - Integrate Alien
>> - Improve code quality (e.g., make selected Lint tests pass)
>> - Continuous integration system
>>
>> (http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Milestones)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Adrian
>>
>> On Nov 7, 2009, at 20:15 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>>
>>> mmmmmmm are we already in  1.1 alpha ???   isn't it to early ?
>>>
>>> Best
>>>
>>> Mariano
>>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Marcus Denker <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/24734/PharoCore-1.1-11035-
>>>> alp
>>>> ha.zip
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to