El sáb, 07-11-2009 a las 21:12 +0100, Adrian Lienhard escribió: > On Nov 7, 2009, at 20:59 , Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > > > A 1.1 alpha under construction is great. When do underscores > > appear, especially in class names? I thought I saw that creeping > > forward, and want to register my encouragement of any effort to have > > that appear in 1.1. Ok, I'll stop nagging :) > > It shouldn't be hard to do in 1.1. I discussed with Lukas today and > one open question is whether we want to enforce _ not being a valid > assignment already in 1.0. I fear a bit that people will complain > because they have to fix their code before being able to load it into > Pharo. Does anybody see a problem with this? From the previous > discussion I understand that most people would favor the change. But > is 1.0 too early? >
Not too early for new projects that always used := for assigment but older code has _ sometimes and they could't load them in 1.0 without modification. It should be allowed _ assignment on 1.0 but fully forbidden on 1.1. Also, the release notes of 1.0 should remark quite loud that the _ assigment is obsolete and should never again be allowed. > > > > For 1.0, I'm still stuck by the SharedQueue2 problem. I cannot load > > the sequencable collection fixes into either RC image - I thought I > > might be able to load it into RC1-dev and then file out the needed > > pieces into RC1-web, but no-go :( > > Can you also try to load your code into a core image? The update I did > yesterday includes the SharedQueue2 fixes. Please let us know if it > does not fix the problem. > > Adrian > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected] > > ] On Behalf Of Adrian Lienhard > > Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 2:38 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] prebuilt 1.1 #11035 > > > > Yes, we have a 1.0 and a 1.1 stream now (actually since the sprint > > in Lille). > > > > I'm integrating remaining critical fixes for 1.0, while Stef and the > > other integrators have started working on 1.1. I don't think it's > > too early at all. It allows us to keep the pace to move forward with > > new stuff, while stabilizing and afterwards maintaining the 1.0 > > release. > > > > Just as a reminder, here are the main goals we have set for 1.1: > > > > - New preferences system > > - Integrate Alien > > - Improve code quality (e.g., make selected Lint tests pass) > > - Continuous integration system > > > > (http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Milestones) > > > > Cheers, > > Adrian > > > > On Nov 7, 2009, at 20:15 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > > > >> mmmmmmm are we already in 1.1 alpha ??? isn't it to early ? > >> > >> Best > >> > >> Mariano > >> > >> On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> http://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/24734/PharoCore-1.1-11035- > >>> alp > >>> ha.zip > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Pharo-project mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Pharo-project mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pharo-project mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project -- Miguel Cobá http://miguel.leugim.com.mx _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
