On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > Levente, > > I have to call you out on something: SSL is **definitely** not crap, and we > should have a clean interface to it, probably via OpenSSL. I will eventually > create same if not beaten to it.
That's true, I was thinking about the rpc stuff. > > CORBA is also not crap. To be blunt, none of the listed technologies are > crap if one has an externally defined problem (aka something that pay$ the > bill$) that requires communicating with something that uses them. I will > grant you that most of them have a pretty high crap coefficient, and I would > not go out of my way to use them unless "forced" to do so. > Crap may not be the best word (but fits really well IMO), so overcomplicated bloatware. Levente > Bill > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Levente > Uzonyi > Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 5:45 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Developer guide ... ? > > On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Guido Stepken wrote: > > [snip] > > As others pointed out, these are implemented with blocks. What would you do > if, say you wanted to know how to do threading in java? Reading a book or > googling is helpful: > - http://www.google.com/search?q=squeak+threads > (I guess a chapter on processes would be useful in PBE/SBE.) > >> 5. Standards: XML-RPC, SOAP, RMI, CORBA, .... encryption (SSL) ... >> Without having a precise idea, where to find working examples to >> exchance data with other systems, i would hesitate to begin to do projects >> with Pharo/Squeak... > > Some of this crap is available at squeaksource/squeakmap. > > Levente > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
