thanks for the info, Dale Adrian
On Mar 25, 2010, at 18:10 , Dale Henrichs wrote: > Adrian, > > 1.0-beta.25 has been released. So it is now _stable_ . No new issues have > appeared, yet, but if any do appear I'll do a dot release. > > Dale > ----- "Adrian Lienhard" <[email protected]> wrote: > > | Because there are a few things left that still need to be done for the > | release: > | - make all tests in Pharo 1.0 pass > | - write a clean and complete change log (I did a pass this morning) > | [1] > | - use different Metacello version? > | - create a one-click image > | > | Cheers, > | Adrian > | > | [1] http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/ActionsInPharoOneDotOne > | > | On Mar 25, 2010, at 10:20 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > | > | > good question. > | > I'm doing 1.1 and 1.0 is not in my radar. > | > We should learn for 1.1 to make it faster and one way is to get > | tests greener before. > | > > | > Stef > | > > | > > | >> Hi, > | >> > | >> But if it is done, why don't you just release the official one? > | >> > | >> Cheers, > | >> Doru > | >> > | >> > | >> On 25 Mar 2010, at 09:25, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > | >> > | >>> +1 > | >>> > | >>> 1.1 is waiting for you guys and it is sexy and requires people to > | use it :) > | >>> > | >>> On Mar 25, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Marcus Denker wrote: > | >>> > | >>>> > | >>>> On Mar 25, 2010, at 8:53 AM, Geert Claes wrote: > | >>>> > | >>>>> > | >>>>> > | >>>>> Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > | >>>>>> > | >>>>>> Sorry. Want I wanted to ask is...for next Pharo releases, I do > | the same > | >>>>>> but > | >>>>>> making clear O2 is not by default ? or I just don't say > | anything about O2 > | >>>>>> in the release ? > | >>>>>> > | >>>>> > | >>>>> While choice is a good thing it does make things more > | complicated and the > | >>>>> PBE book will need to just choose one I guess. It should be > | easier to swap > | >>>>> betweem OB or O2 though, maybe not necessarily both in the same > | image at the > | >>>>> same time but easy to load/unload. > | >>>>> > | >>>>> Have they really moved that far apart that the initial idea of > | >>>>> OB-Enhancements is not possible? > | >>>>> > | >>>> > | >>>> 1.0 is *DONE* *DONE* *DONE*. We should not discuss changing now > | everthing again. > | >>>> We can do that for 1.1 > | >>>> > | >>>> 1.0 does not have O2. > | >>>> > | >>>> So for the book, there will be a special image with O2 loaded. > | >>>> > | >>>> Marcus > | >>>> > | >>>> > | >>>> -- > | >>>> Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de > | >>>> INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD. > | >>>> > | >>>> > | >>>> _______________________________________________ > | >>>> Pharo-project mailing list > | >>>> [email protected] > | >>>> > | http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > | >>> > | >>> > | >>> _______________________________________________ > | >>> Pharo-project mailing list > | >>> [email protected] > | >>> > | http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > | >> > | >> -- > | >> www.tudorgirba.com > | >> > | >> "Reasonable is what we are accustomed with." > | >> > | >> > | >> _______________________________________________ > | >> Pharo-project mailing list > | >> [email protected] > | >> > | http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > | > > | > > | > _______________________________________________ > | > Pharo-project mailing list > | > [email protected] > | > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > | > | > | _______________________________________________ > | Pharo-project mailing list > | [email protected] > | http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
