Henrik Johansen a écrit :
On Apr 29, 2010, at 11:30 06AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
It's not a question of one vs. the other, really.
The cs doesn't change the Settings implementation, it simply adds support for
also discovering settings defined in the pragma style used by Squeak.
The downside is you'd have two ways to define settings.
The upside is the
the upside is ... :)
well, I will have a look at the cs.
I would prefer that this changes do not introduce any
overwriting so that it can be loaded separately as a compatibility package.
so, i will investigate the changes needed for the settingbrowser.
is that ok like that ?
Cheers
Alain
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
