On Apr 29, 2010, at 1:44 29PM, Alain Plantec wrote: > Henrik Johansen a écrit : >> On Apr 29, 2010, at 11:30 06AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >> >> It's not a question of one vs. the other, really. >> The cs doesn't change the Settings implementation, it simply adds support >> for also discovering settings defined in the pragma style used by Squeak. >> The downside is you'd have two ways to define settings. >> The upside is the > the upside is ... :) > well, I will have a look at the cs. > I would prefer that this changes do not introduce any > overwriting so that it can be loaded separately as a compatibility package. > so, i will investigate the changes needed for the settingbrowser. > is that ok like that ? > Cheers > Alain
It needs a way to register new valid preference pragmas, and setting generators for such pragmas. May I suggest... using pragmas? ;P Cheers, Henry _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
