Yes sounds good. Prove that 3 methods are enough because we are cool :)
>> It's not a question of one vs. the other, really. >> The cs doesn't change the Settings implementation, it simply adds support >> for also discovering settings defined in the pragma style used by Squeak. >> The downside is you'd have two ways to define settings. >> The upside is the > the upside is ... :) > well, I will have a look at the cs. > I would prefer that this changes do not introduce any > overwriting so that it can be loaded separately as a compatibility package. > so, i will investigate the changes needed for the settingbrowser. > is that ok like that ? > Cheers > Alain > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
