Let me know if there is other code that needs to be moved. Lukas
Name: Refactoring-Core-lr.143 Author: lr Time: 10 June 2010, 3:34:12 pm UUID: 91014fcc-aa9f-4590-a22c-f8a1a0a5daa1 Ancestors: Refactoring-Core-lr.142 - moved some code from OB-Refactory Name: Refactoring-Tests-Core-lr.44 Author: lr Time: 10 June 2010, 3:34:37 pm UUID: 35e845c2-d58e-4b76-a1b7-bcec35761870 Ancestors: Refactoring-Tests-Core-lr.43 - moved some code from OB-Refactory Name: OB-Refactory-lr.214 Author: lr Time: 10 June 2010, 3:35:01 pm UUID: 70a76d23-ab08-450f-88c0-556b70666ed0 Ancestors: OB-Refactory-lr.213 - moved some code to Refactoring-Core On 10 June 2010 15:13, Lukas Renggli <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10 June 2010 13:40, Fernando olivero <[email protected]> wrote: >> Lukas do you think it would worth it to change the category of several >> methods, from extensions to OB to the refactoring engine itself. >> >> For example in my case i don't need OB at all, but are forced to load just >> because this extensions are goodies i've need when using the refactoring >> engine. >> >> For example >> >> BrowserEnvironment>>allNonMetaClasses >> >> from the category *ob-refactory-accessing >> >> Maybe it's an sign that these belong to the refactoring engine package, the >> model, and not Ob, the view. >> >> What do you think? > > Yeah, that makes sense. We just have to write tests for them in the > refactoring tests. > > Lukas > > >> >> Fernando >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > > -- > Lukas Renggli > www.lukas-renggli.ch > -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
