Great Lukas, thank you! I would like to minimize the preconditions of Gaucho.
To continue in that front, since i'm using NewTextMorph , i would like to remove also the dependency to SHOUT. To continue in this front , is was thinking to get rid of the SHOUT parser and styler by reusing the already present RB, by subclassing the already present RBProgramNodeVisitor, such as RBFormatter, in order to implement a RBCodeStyler. Are you aware if this has been done already? If i'll implement it and publish it. Fernando pd: Will let you know when i run into other methods to i think need to be moved. On Jun 10, 2010, at 3:35 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote: > Let me know if there is other code that needs to be moved. > > Lukas > > Name: Refactoring-Core-lr.143 > Author: lr > Time: 10 June 2010, 3:34:12 pm > UUID: 91014fcc-aa9f-4590-a22c-f8a1a0a5daa1 > Ancestors: Refactoring-Core-lr.142 > > - moved some code from OB-Refactory > > Name: Refactoring-Tests-Core-lr.44 > Author: lr > Time: 10 June 2010, 3:34:37 pm > UUID: 35e845c2-d58e-4b76-a1b7-bcec35761870 > Ancestors: Refactoring-Tests-Core-lr.43 > > - moved some code from OB-Refactory > > Name: OB-Refactory-lr.214 > Author: lr > Time: 10 June 2010, 3:35:01 pm > UUID: 70a76d23-ab08-450f-88c0-556b70666ed0 > Ancestors: OB-Refactory-lr.213 > > - moved some code to Refactoring-Core > > On 10 June 2010 15:13, Lukas Renggli <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 10 June 2010 13:40, Fernando olivero <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Lukas do you think it would worth it to change the category of several >>> methods, from extensions to OB to the refactoring engine itself. >>> >>> For example in my case i don't need OB at all, but are forced to load just >>> because this extensions are goodies i've need when using the refactoring >>> engine. >>> >>> For example >>> >>> BrowserEnvironment>>allNonMetaClasses >>> >>> from the category *ob-refactory-accessing >>> >>> Maybe it's an sign that these belong to the refactoring engine package, the >>> model, and not Ob, the view. >>> >>> What do you think? >> >> Yeah, that makes sense. We just have to write tests for them in the >> refactoring tests. >> >> Lukas >> >> >>> >>> Fernando >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Lukas Renggli >> www.lukas-renggli.ch >> > > > > -- > Lukas Renggli > www.lukas-renggli.ch > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
