why shout does not suit you for color highlighting? When I see RB on VW I think that shout is really much better.
Stef On Jun 10, 2010, at 4:19 PM, Fernando olivero wrote: > Great Lukas, thank you! I would like to minimize the preconditions of Gaucho. > > To continue in that front, since i'm using NewTextMorph , i would like to > remove also the dependency to SHOUT. > > To continue in this front , is was thinking to get rid of the SHOUT parser > and styler by reusing the already present RB, by subclassing the already > present RBProgramNodeVisitor, such as RBFormatter, in order to implement a > RBCodeStyler. > > Are you aware if this has been done already? If i'll implement it and publish > it. > > > Fernando > > pd: Will let you know when i run into other methods to i think need to be > moved. > > > > On Jun 10, 2010, at 3:35 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote: > >> Let me know if there is other code that needs to be moved. >> >> Lukas >> >> Name: Refactoring-Core-lr.143 >> Author: lr >> Time: 10 June 2010, 3:34:12 pm >> UUID: 91014fcc-aa9f-4590-a22c-f8a1a0a5daa1 >> Ancestors: Refactoring-Core-lr.142 >> >> - moved some code from OB-Refactory >> >> Name: Refactoring-Tests-Core-lr.44 >> Author: lr >> Time: 10 June 2010, 3:34:37 pm >> UUID: 35e845c2-d58e-4b76-a1b7-bcec35761870 >> Ancestors: Refactoring-Tests-Core-lr.43 >> >> - moved some code from OB-Refactory >> >> Name: OB-Refactory-lr.214 >> Author: lr >> Time: 10 June 2010, 3:35:01 pm >> UUID: 70a76d23-ab08-450f-88c0-556b70666ed0 >> Ancestors: OB-Refactory-lr.213 >> >> - moved some code to Refactoring-Core >> >> On 10 June 2010 15:13, Lukas Renggli <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 10 June 2010 13:40, Fernando olivero <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Lukas do you think it would worth it to change the category of several >>>> methods, from extensions to OB to the refactoring engine itself. >>>> >>>> For example in my case i don't need OB at all, but are forced to load just >>>> because this extensions are goodies i've need when using the refactoring >>>> engine. >>>> >>>> For example >>>> >>>> BrowserEnvironment>>allNonMetaClasses >>>> >>>> from the category *ob-refactory-accessing >>>> >>>> Maybe it's an sign that these belong to the refactoring engine package, >>>> the model, and not Ob, the view. >>>> >>>> What do you think? >>> >>> Yeah, that makes sense. We just have to write tests for them in the >>> refactoring tests. >>> >>> Lukas >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Fernando >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pharo-project mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Lukas Renggli >>> www.lukas-renggli.ch >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Lukas Renggli >> www.lukas-renggli.ch >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
