Philippe this is good that you reacted. The point of esug is to support actions 
that will help people so probably XML-RCP is not a really good choice.
Now what would be good is to have a map of current techno and their support
for smalltalk. Then act to fill up the gaps.

Stef

> 
> It doesn't strike me as a forward looking investment. IMHO XML-RCP is
> something that will only get used less in the future, not more. The
> value you get from an XML-RCP implementation will become less and less
> as fewer services support it.
> 
> But then again ESUG is free to spend their money on what they seem fit.
> If they disagree or decide the current use is big enough, I have no
> problem at all with this.
> 
> Cheers
> Philippe
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to