goran it would be great to consolidate such information on pharo book with pointers to the associated source repository. Do you have a bit of time for that?
Stef On Jul 1, 2010, at 12:10 AM, Göran Krampe wrote: > Hi! > > On 06/30/2010 10:36 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote: >> Taking about more future oriented stuff, I think it would be nice to have >> good support for document DBs (like CouchDB and MongoDB) and key/value >> stores (like Redis). > > At least for the former category of DBs, I know that a few people have been > > working on DB clients (see squeaksource.com) but I don't know how complete > > and stable they are. >> >> Adrian > > Braindump: > > For CouchDB there are two client libs on SS, one based on Curl and the other > straight on SocketStream. Both are... quite limited, but I think they are > pretty stable since the CouchDB API is RESTful its kinda easy. > > MongoDB has MongoTalk on SS by no other than Kent Beck. It looks quite > ambitious and with a single little tweak the tests went green for me. MongoDB > has IMHO more "buzz" right now and CouchDB seems slightly "stalling". I would > guess MongoDB will grab more and more developer mindshare as time goes by, > since it fits better with most apps actually. > > I am not aware of any binding for Redis. And yes, Redis is "neat" in its own > way. > > I wrote a quite ambitious binding for Tokyo Tyrant, its on SS and has tests > too. I think it is stable, but I am not that interested currently. > > My next little project in this arena would be a binding for Riak, since I > think it is next to MongoDB and CouchDB one of the more interesting ones out > there. It also has a RESTful API just like CouchDB and using WebClient seems > logical these days. > > Finally I think another *hole* in our toolshed is support for all the funky > new cool MQ products. I started implementing STOMP the other day and it will > just take an hour or two to get it finished. Yes, there is an AMQP protocol > implementation on SS, but I found it... quite undocumented. Given the author > it is probably very correct though. > > regards, Göran > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
