On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Serge Stinckwich < [email protected]> wrote:
> 2010/7/7 Mariano Martinez Peck <[email protected]>: > > Hi. Henry made me remember that we need to update the VMs links for Pharo > > 1.1. We are in RC4 and very very near of the stable release. Thus, I > suggest > > to fix this problem. > > > > You can see in http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2646 > > > > Mac: > > 4.2.5 > > Windows: > > 4.0.2 > > Linux: > > 4.0.3.2202 > > > > What I am not sure if we should put these links in a particular section > of > > Pharo 1.1 or just update the current VMs links. The problem of doing the > > last one is that these VMs will be downloaded for both images: 1.0 and > 1.1. > > Are there problems with it ? The only thing I can image is if the vm > has > > FreeType compiled. > > Hi Mariano, > > maybe it's better to avoid problems by providing two distincts VMs. > And if some people reports problem from 1.0, maybe you will not know > wich VMs they used. > +1. I completly agree. Adrian, could you do this please? Thanks Mariano > Regards, > -- > Serge Stinckwich > UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam > Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk > http://doesnotunderstand.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
