- I updated the Mac VM link to point to version 4.2.5beta1U. This version certainly also makes sense for Pharo 1.0. - I didn't change the other links since the Windows one already points to the proposed version (4.0.2) and the Unix link does not point to a specific version.
So no need to have a separate set of links if they are all the same. Does that make sense? Cheers, Adrian On Jul 8, 2010, at 02:59 , Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote: > One concern: having separate download links in no way tells us what vm > someone uses with a particular version, and we can't assume that it does. > > > > ________________________________________ > From: [email protected] > [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mariano Martinez > Peck [[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 6:11 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Updating VM links for Pharo 1.1 > > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Adrian Lienhard > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > I'm a bit confused. Do we want to have a separate set of VMs or not? > > Yes, I vote to put them separated. > > Furthermore, the link to the Unix VM just goes to http://squeakvm.org/unix/, > but not to a particular version. > > > As far as I know, there is not way to link to a particular version. You can, > but to a particular version/platform (for example, GNU/Linux, FreeBSD, etc...) > > Cheers, > Adrian > > > On Jul 7, 2010, at 14:09 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Serge Stinckwich < >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >>> 2010/7/7 Mariano Martinez Peck >>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>: >>>> Hi. Henry made me remember that we need to update the VMs links for Pharo >>>> 1.1. We are in RC4 and very very near of the stable release. Thus, I >>> suggest >>>> to fix this problem. >>>> >>>> You can see in http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2646 >>>> >>>> Mac: >>>> 4.2.5 >>>> Windows: >>>> 4.0.2 >>>> Linux: >>>> 4.0.3.2202 >>>> >>>> What I am not sure if we should put these links in a particular section >>> of >>>> Pharo 1.1 or just update the current VMs links. The problem of doing the >>>> last one is that these VMs will be downloaded for both images: 1.0 and >>> 1.1. >>>> Are there problems with it ? The only thing I can image is if the vm >>> has >>>> FreeType compiled. >>> >>> Hi Mariano, >>> >>> maybe it's better to avoid problems by providing two distincts VMs. >>> And if some people reports problem from 1.0, maybe you will not know >>> wich VMs they used. >>> >> >> +1. I completly agree. >> >> Adrian, could you do this please? >> >> Thanks >> >> Mariano >> >> >>> Regards, >>> -- >>> Serge Stinckwich >>> UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam >>> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk >>> http://doesnotunderstand.org/ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pharo-project mailing list >>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
