I'm a bit confused. Do we want to have a separate set of VMs or not? Furthermore, the link to the Unix VM just goes to http://squeakvm.org/unix/, but not to a particular version.
Cheers, Adrian On Jul 7, 2010, at 14:09 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Serge Stinckwich < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> 2010/7/7 Mariano Martinez Peck <[email protected]>: >>> Hi. Henry made me remember that we need to update the VMs links for Pharo >>> 1.1. We are in RC4 and very very near of the stable release. Thus, I >> suggest >>> to fix this problem. >>> >>> You can see in http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2646 >>> >>> Mac: >>> 4.2.5 >>> Windows: >>> 4.0.2 >>> Linux: >>> 4.0.3.2202 >>> >>> What I am not sure if we should put these links in a particular section >> of >>> Pharo 1.1 or just update the current VMs links. The problem of doing the >>> last one is that these VMs will be downloaded for both images: 1.0 and >> 1.1. >>> Are there problems with it ? The only thing I can image is if the vm >> has >>> FreeType compiled. >> >> Hi Mariano, >> >> maybe it's better to avoid problems by providing two distincts VMs. >> And if some people reports problem from 1.0, maybe you will not know >> wich VMs they used. >> > > +1. I completly agree. > > Adrian, could you do this please? > > Thanks > > Mariano > > >> Regards, >> -- >> Serge Stinckwich >> UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam >> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk >> http://doesnotunderstand.org/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
