This is better to explicit put a MIT licence. If there is no licence, normally you can't do anything with the code.
Le 26 sept. 2010 à 17:45, DeNigris Sean <[email protected]> a écrit : > I emailed Andres, the author, and he said "the code didn't have a license > because I meant to put no restrictions on it... The MIT license is fine with > me. In fact, I released the Hash Analysis Tool and Assessments under the MIT > license already." > > Then he asked a great question: "Let me know what you need and I'll put it > in. Or do you need that the book explicitly states the code mentioned > therein is MIT?" > > I've been contacting many people to declare code as MIT. What "proof" is > considered acceptable? I've been announcing it on the mailing list, so > anyone could search back, contact me, and I could send them the email I > received from the author, but that requires remembering the post, finding it, > etc. What's the best way to go about this? License gurus? > > Sean > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
