I am not sure the code in the book needs a license. After all,
eventually you will get the distribution for the source code in question
and then you will (should) have an MIT license... does that make sense?
On 9/30/10 19:23 , Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
Andres Valloud-4 wrote:
Well, since this discussion is public now :)
hee hee
Andres Valloud-4 wrote:
... exactly what seems to be
the problem? The book talks about code that is often in the public
Store repository. Is the problem that the code in the public Store
repository doesn't have an MIT license? Or is the problem that the book
that talks about the code in the public Store repository doesn't say
"and the code has an MIT license"?
Would a license expert weigh in here? Andres, would it be difficult to add
a note to the book specifying that the code in it is MIT?
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
