Andres Valloud-4 wrote: > > Well, since this discussion is public now :) > hee hee
Andres Valloud-4 wrote: > > ... exactly what seems to be > the problem? The book talks about code that is often in the public > Store repository. Is the problem that the code in the public Store > repository doesn't have an MIT license? Or is the problem that the book > that talks about the code in the public Store repository doesn't say > "and the code has an MIT license"? > Would a license expert weigh in here? Andres, would it be difficult to add a note to the book specifying that the code in it is MIT? -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/A-Mentoring-Course-on-Smalltalk-Code-License-tp2714255p2803323.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
