Sig, I disagree; the layout policy should arrange the morphs it controls. To do otherwise demands that the morphs be able to cope with any type of layout one might want. The various algorithms have to go somewhere; they might as well go in the layouts.
Bill ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Igor Stasenko [[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2010 2:50 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] About SimpleMorphic it is hard to say, what layout policies we may need, and what can be removed/simplified. What i feel wrong with scheme, that from message names it feels like a container morph is responsible for layout, while i think, that it is submorph(s) themselves should be responsible and know how to place them within parent morph.
