Hi Fernando,
Fernando Olivero wrote:
I just ran the examples, and just can say...NICE!!
m := LayoutMorph example3
m width: 400.
m width: 600.
row := m submorphs anyOne.
row submorphs last delete.
row delete.
m delete.
I've just added these lines to the example. You can find the minor
changes in the attached changeset.
Thanks!
AH! i've misread the submorph of LayoutMorph part.
Still i think that LayoutMorph does not necessarily have to be a
Morph, because it only has the responsibility of laying out a group of
"rectangles" right? My comments were in this direction, to decouple
LayoutMorph from Morph. I couldn't tell if Brazil's Area is a "Brazil
visual", but i ask why not decuple it?
That would be an interesting experiment. I guess these non-morph object
in the morph / submorphs tree will need to support many messages of the
Morph protocol. I guess someone needs to do it and see if the results
are good. Go for it!
When i did my own GauchoLayouts i've implemented like this, but now i
would like ditch them and use your classes and merge them with Morph.
You already did non-morph objects in the submorph tree? How was the
result? Do you like it? Can we see the code?
Fernando
pd: i couldnt go to Smalltalks this year, so sadly i wont see you next
talk on Morphic3.0?
Well, I'm not giving a talk this year, so at least you're not missing
that :(
I will continue to play with you layout morphs, and possibly adapt
them to Pharo.
Fernando
Great!
Cheers,
Juan Vuletich
