On 11/10/10, Fernando Olivero <[email protected]> wrote: > I just ran the examples, and just can say...NICE!! > > m := LayoutMorph example3 > m width: 400. > m width: 600. > row := m submorphs anyOne. > row submorphs last delete. > row delete. > m delete. > ....
> Still i think that LayoutMorph does not necessarily have to be a > Morph, because it only has the responsibility of laying out a group of > "rectangles" right? My comments were in this direction, to decouple > LayoutMorph from Morph. I couldn't tell if Brazil's Area is a "Brazil > visual", but i ask why not decuple it? Good question --- I am curious to see what the answers will be..... --Hannes
