Den 21.12.2010 18:57, skrev Miguel Cobá: > El mar, 21-12-2010 a las 18:51 +0100, Levente Uzonyi escribió: >> On Tue, 21 Dec 2010, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: >> >>> On 21 Dec 2010, at 00:14, Levente Uzonyi wrote: >>> >>>> Really? The third question has 3 wrong answers... >>> OK, I'll take the bait: I was looking for a high-quality, professional, >>> well-maintained open-source Smalltalk supported by an active community with >>> the right ideas, attitudes and ideals going forward, and I am happy I found >>> it. And it seems I am not the only one. >> I guess you're missing my point, which is: the post has false statements. > Maybe you can show us the false statements and not let us guess what are > you refering to b) and c) definetely. The situation was rather different back around april, if his last exposure to Squeak was back then it could be called merely outdated. a) is debatable I guess, with the unloading work that's been done in Squeak, depending on how you define "removing". (I think Cuis would win this one hands down if it were included for consideration though)
Cheers, Henry
