Hi, On 13 Jan 2011, at 11:12, Igor Stasenko wrote:
> On 13 January 2011 10:41, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: >> Of course, it is MIT and you can do what you want with it. I simply answered >> the question from Stef, and I meant that I won't include it in the code from >> the Glamour repository. If you do want to modify it in the mentioned >> direction, I would kindly ask you to use a different name to avoid confusion >> and conflicts - this theme is used by the Moose distribution. >> > > Can you clarify: > a) you don't want to modify Glamorous theme (GLMUITheme) by taking > all methods from GLMUITheme2. Yes > b) you don't want to add a GLMUITheme2 , which is a subclass of GLMUITheme > because these changes could live in GLMUITheme2, which is perfectly > fine, while keeping an original GLMUITheme > not changed. > And we can call GLMUITheme2 a 'Glamorous orange' > :) Yes :). It's true that technically it would work, but from an intention point of view it does not fit. Also, in general, except on very few occasions, I won't support adding anything that has a number at the end to distinguish the name :). Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "The coherence of a trip is given by the clearness of the goal."
