On 13 January 2011 11:29, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On 13 Jan 2011, at 11:12, Igor Stasenko wrote: > >> On 13 January 2011 10:41, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Of course, it is MIT and you can do what you want with it. I simply >>> answered the question from Stef, and I meant that I won't include it in the >>> code from the Glamour repository. If you do want to modify it in the >>> mentioned direction, I would kindly ask you to use a different name to >>> avoid confusion and conflicts - this theme is used by the Moose >>> distribution. >>> >> >> Can you clarify: >> a) you don't want to modify Glamorous theme (GLMUITheme) by taking >> all methods from GLMUITheme2. > > Yes > >> b) you don't want to add a GLMUITheme2 , which is a subclass of GLMUITheme >> because these changes could live in GLMUITheme2, which is perfectly >> fine, while keeping an original GLMUITheme >> not changed. >> And we can call GLMUITheme2 a 'Glamorous orange' >> :) > > Yes :). It's true that technically it would work, but from an intention point > of view it does not fit. Also, in general, except on very few occasions, I > won't support adding anything that has a number at the end to distinguish the > name :). >
Not a big deal.. We can rename it to GLMOrangeUITheme and make available to Pharo people? Still no? :) > Cheers, > Doru > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "The coherence of a trip is given by the clearness of the goal." > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
