I agree with Adrian Alexandre
Le 31 janv. 2011 à 15:31, Adrian Lienhard <[email protected]> a écrit : > -1 > > ...because in my opinion there should be exactly one main domain name. The > additional names should just redirect to this one. Of course we could discuss > whether pharo.st should be that main domain. But (already quite long time > ago) we decided to go for pharo-project.org. I still think that is the better > name, in particular for people who don't know what the meaning of .st is. I > think they are less likely to klick on www.pharo.st in a search engine than > on www.pharo-project.org. > > Cheers, > Adrian > > On Jan 31, 2011, at 21:15 , Diogenes Moreira wrote: > >> Always ready. as a boy scout.. only send me de ssh conxion... >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Esteban Lorenzano >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> I tried pharo.st to reach pharo. I liked. It's small, concise, beautiful >>> (and it has a .st!) >>> One problem is that as soon as you type pharo.st, you loose the url. I >>> would like to stay in the url I entered to pharo-project. I think this is >>> easily doable with an apache configuration. >>> I'm not an apache guy, but I'm sure if there are some problem with this, >>> and all of you agree this is desirable, someone from the list (cough, cough, >>> Diógenes, cough, cough) can do the job :) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Esteban >>> > >
