+1 Doru
On 31 Jan 2011, at 22:24, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > I agree with Adrian > > Alexandre > > > > Le 31 janv. 2011 à 15:31, Adrian Lienhard <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> -1 >> >> ...because in my opinion there should be exactly one main domain name. The >> additional names should just redirect to this one. Of course we could >> discuss whether pharo.st should be that main domain. But (already quite long >> time ago) we decided to go for pharo-project.org. I still think that is the >> better name, in particular for people who don't know what the meaning of .st >> is. I think they are less likely to klick on www.pharo.st in a search engine >> than on www.pharo-project.org. >> >> Cheers, >> Adrian >> >> On Jan 31, 2011, at 21:15 , Diogenes Moreira wrote: >> >>> Always ready. as a boy scout.. only send me de ssh conxion... >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Esteban Lorenzano >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> I tried pharo.st to reach pharo. I liked. It's small, concise, beautiful >>>> (and it has a .st!) >>>> One problem is that as soon as you type pharo.st, you loose the url. I >>>> would like to stay in the url I entered to pharo-project. I think this is >>>> easily doable with an apache configuration. >>>> I'm not an apache guy, but I'm sure if there are some problem with this, >>>> and all of you agree this is desirable, someone from the list (cough, >>>> cough, >>>> Diógenes, cough, cough) can do the job :) >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Esteban >>>> >> >> > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Yesterday is a fact. Tomorrow is a possibility. Today is a challenge."
