ok, ok... I'm a minority :P I retire my proposition. best, Esteban
El 31/01/2011, a las 6:36p.m., Tudor Girba escribió: > +1 > > Doru > > > On 31 Jan 2011, at 22:24, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > >> I agree with Adrian >> >> Alexandre >> >> >> >> Le 31 janv. 2011 à 15:31, Adrian Lienhard <[email protected]> a écrit : >> >>> -1 >>> >>> ...because in my opinion there should be exactly one main domain name. The >>> additional names should just redirect to this one. Of course we could >>> discuss whether pharo.st should be that main domain. But (already quite >>> long time ago) we decided to go for pharo-project.org. I still think that >>> is the better name, in particular for people who don't know what the >>> meaning of .st is. I think they are less likely to klick on www.pharo.st in >>> a search engine than on www.pharo-project.org. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Adrian >>> >>> On Jan 31, 2011, at 21:15 , Diogenes Moreira wrote: >>> >>>> Always ready. as a boy scout.. only send me de ssh conxion... >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Esteban Lorenzano >>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> I tried pharo.st to reach pharo. I liked. It's small, concise, beautiful >>>>> (and it has a .st!) >>>>> One problem is that as soon as you type pharo.st, you loose the url. I >>>>> would like to stay in the url I entered to pharo-project. I think this is >>>>> easily doable with an apache configuration. >>>>> I'm not an apache guy, but I'm sure if there are some problem with this, >>>>> and all of you agree this is desirable, someone from the list (cough, >>>>> cough, >>>>> Diógenes, cough, cough) can do the job :) >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Esteban >>>>> >>> >>> >> > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Yesterday is a fact. > Tomorrow is a possibility. > Today is a challenge." > > > >
