+1 On Aug 23, 2011, at 10:42 AM, Marcus Denker wrote:
> > On Aug 23, 2011, at 9:54 AM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > >> These issues are for 1.2.2. Who is maintaining it by the way? > > We maintain the current released image. But when people provide easy to > integrate, clear and useful > bug fixes for older versions, we integrate them. > > (this was done for 1.1.2, it has all fixes that where added for 1.2.2) > > Of course it would be possible (and I would prefer it), if a group of 1.2 > users could take that > over (e.g. commercial users that are actually using 1.2) > > The idea would not to actively develope it, but just make sure that all the > fixes are added that > make sense (bug fixes, mostly). *And* make that driven and coordingated by > actual users of > that version. This way we make sure that a release gets important fixes as > long as it is used. > > We could have such a group for just every version released: It gets "handed > off" to the people > using the release. This group than of course, with time, gets smaller, and in > the end fades > away. > > The most important effect of this would be to not burn people maintaining old > versions they > don't use themselves... > > Marcus > > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de > >
