On Sep 5, 2011, at 2:06 PM, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
>
> By the way, I would find it cool to have an optional byteCode view
> parallel to source code view and see the execution of byte codes, and
> why not, a view of Context stack frames.
> Also, the debugger might step message by message (AST-based) rather
> than byteCode by byteCode, is this what you mean by wrong abstraction
> level ?
>
With the wrong abstraction level: Why do we care about stepping bytecodes
at all? Why not only have an AST interpreter based debugger?
Marcus
--
Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de
