> > OK, then I finally succeeded in decoding Marcus/Stef high level > instructions into low level specifications. > I translate here for those obscurantists speaking native gdb: you want > step/jump instead of stepi/jumpi. > But it would have been better to provide detailed explanations from > the beginning for slow brained like me ;). > > Nonetheless, you still need to map execution machiney to source code > because of initial program counter, and in case of AST-based stepping, > the map must be bi-directional in order to execute multiple bytecodes > sometimes required by a single instruction. > > Nicolas
yes :) we were not clear. Do not worry. Stef
