On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Frank Shearar <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 10 October 2011 14:22, Igor Stasenko <[email protected]> wrote: > > My first impression: > > - a cross-breeding of C and .... C and a bit of C.. and then C on top. > > > > And i bet it is implemented in C > > :D > > You mean C#, of course. C#, with a side order of share-nothing message > passing concurrency. C# on the whole isn't a bad language: it's way > better than Java (which isn't, admittedly, exactly a high bar). > > But still, Dart seems like nothing to write home about. > > Note one sneaky thing: using an image as means of deployment: > http://www.infoq.com/news/2011/10/google-dart-language mentions "Dart > comes with tools to create an image of the heap of an application and > package it into an optimized format which can be loaded nearly > instantly, reminiscient of Smalltalk's image system." > > A couple of hours ago, I have asked this: https://groups.google.com/a/dartlang.org/group/misc/browse_thread/thread/fd4e8b652db6e8ee# > Funny, given the number of arguments Smalltalkers have with people > over the use of images. > > frank > > > On 10 October 2011 14:43, Pavel Krivanek <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Google published the first information about Dart: > >> http://www.dartlang.org/ > >> > >> Cheers, > >> -- Pavel > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Igor Stasenko. > > > > > > -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
