Interesting, Do they (darters) see Amber? 2011/10/10 Mariano Martinez Peck <[email protected]>
> > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Frank Shearar <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On 10 October 2011 14:22, Igor Stasenko <[email protected]> wrote: >> > My first impression: >> > - a cross-breeding of C and .... C and a bit of C.. and then C on top. >> > >> > And i bet it is implemented in C >> > :D >> >> You mean C#, of course. C#, with a side order of share-nothing message >> passing concurrency. C# on the whole isn't a bad language: it's way >> better than Java (which isn't, admittedly, exactly a high bar). >> >> But still, Dart seems like nothing to write home about. >> >> Note one sneaky thing: using an image as means of deployment: >> http://www.infoq.com/news/2011/10/google-dart-language mentions "Dart >> comes with tools to create an image of the heap of an application and >> package it into an optimized format which can be loaded nearly >> instantly, reminiscient of Smalltalk's image system." >> >> > A couple of hours ago, I have asked this: > https://groups.google.com/a/dartlang.org/group/misc/browse_thread/thread/fd4e8b652db6e8ee# > > >> Funny, given the number of arguments Smalltalkers have with people >> over the use of images. >> >> frank >> >> > On 10 October 2011 14:43, Pavel Krivanek <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Google published the first information about Dart: >> >> http://www.dartlang.org/ >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> -- Pavel >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Best regards, >> > Igor Stasenko. >> > >> > >> >> > > > -- > Mariano > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com > >
