On 10 October 2011 18:16, Eliot Miranda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 7:34 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Frank Shearar <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> On 10 October 2011 14:22, Igor Stasenko <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > My first impression: >>> > - a cross-breeding of C and .... C and a bit of C.. and then C on top. >>> > >>> > And i bet it is implemented in C >>> > :D >>> >>> You mean C#, of course. C#, with a side order of share-nothing message >>> passing concurrency. C# on the whole isn't a bad language: it's way >>> better than Java (which isn't, admittedly, exactly a high bar). >>> >>> But still, Dart seems like nothing to write home about. >>> >>> Note one sneaky thing: using an image as means of deployment: >>> http://www.infoq.com/news/2011/10/google-dart-language mentions "Dart >>> comes with tools to create an image of the heap of an application and >>> package it into an optimized format which can be loaded nearly >>> instantly, reminiscient of Smalltalk's image system." >>> >> >> A couple of hours ago, I have asked this: >> https://groups.google.com/a/dartlang.org/group/misc/browse_thread/thread/fd4e8b652db6e8ee# > > You was Gilad's reply? > > Hi Mariano, > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 5:55 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck < > > [email protected]> wrote: > >> So I wonder...is this a kind of Smalltalk image? what is similar and what >> different? > > Better analog is a Strongtalk BST file. It contains the classes > and compile-time constants, but no state. > > -- > Cheers, Gilad > > And as I understand it a BST file is pretty much the same intent as a parcel > or a fuel package containing code. >
Seems so. Except that fuel can contain data "objects" not just code "objects". Okay, 10 years later i hope we again have a new language, which will inherit all current crap + finally "everything is an object" concept :) -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
