That does always seem to be the case. But "boring" is our problem, assuming the thing works as advertised, others might bore themselves to success of which we can only dream - we should be careful about passing judgments. Scalable is a needed element, and I am not at all convinced that many "enterprise" systems deliver on this point any more than we could (can?) w/ load balancing.
Inelegant is probably a key feature of most "enterprise" *code* that gets copy/pasted/tweaked vs. truly engineered for reuse. How's that? Bill ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Marcus Denker [[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 2:32 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Why do we use Pharo? a.k.a. rethinking Pharo marketing On Feb 21, 2012, at 3:11 AM, Krishsmalltalk wrote: > Yes, > > Do not emphasize on one or few keywords. Malleable is better than plastic > (can be off putting for any environment conscious) > > Adopt the Pharo motto: > > "Pharo shall be one of the best enterprise platform in 3 years." Isn't "Enterprise Plattform" another word for "boring and complicated" ?? Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de
