On Mar 27, 2012, at 4:59 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Just a question: while looking at the comments for classes in the browser, > there are often missing entries, even for pretty classic classes. How comes? > > I find myself with a Squeak image running in parallel just to look up some > content. So, content that makes sense is available but didn't got carried > over to pharo. > > Is this a licencing issue? Something else? I have pharo1.0.sources so > comments do show where they are available. > Also, some methods look like a decompile with t1 t2.. where the source exists > in Squeak with the proper parameters. > Normally this should not be the case. We definitly did not remove comments or renamed t1 t2... to me it looks like a config error or a bug.
Can you tell us an example? -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de
