Have you looked at the methods with a fresh image? I've run into the situation a few times that only "decompiled" code is shown and a fresh image has always worked.
Max On 27.03.2012, at 17:11, Marcus Denker wrote: > > On Mar 27, 2012, at 4:59 PM, [email protected] wrote: > >> Just a question: while looking at the comments for classes in the browser, >> there are often missing entries, even for pretty classic classes. How comes? >> >> I find myself with a Squeak image running in parallel just to look up some >> content. So, content that makes sense is available but didn't got carried >> over to pharo. >> >> Is this a licencing issue? Something else? I have pharo1.0.sources so >> comments do show where they are available. >> Also, some methods look like a decompile with t1 t2.. where the source >> exists in Squeak with the proper parameters. >> > Normally this should not be the case. We definitly did not remove comments or > renamed t1 t2... to me it looks like a config error or a bug. > > Can you tell us an example? > > > -- > Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de > >
