On Mar 27, 2012, at 4:58 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Just a question: while looking at the comments for classes in the browser, > there are often missing entries, even for pretty classic classes. How comes?
Because the classes were not commented. > I find myself with a Squeak image running in parallel just to look up some > content. So, content that makes sense is available but didn't got carried > over to pharo. Which classes? Because we improved this aspect. > Is this a licencing issue? Something else? I have pharo1.0.sources so > comments do show where they are available. > Also, some methods look like a decompile with t1 t2.. Strange normally we do not have decompiled code. > where the source exists in Squeak with the proper parameters. > > Thanks in advance for shining some light in the topic. Stef
