On Apr 15, 2012, at 2:11 PM, Edgar J. De Cleene wrote: > > > > On 4/15/12 8:50 AM, "Marcus Denker" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I would not waste time with that... we will improve Pharo constantly, and it >> will >> be very hard (if not impossible) to keep some kind of compatibility layer on >> a >> binary >> code level between Pharo, Squeak and Cuis. >> >> And what do you get out of it? Wouldn't it be better to use the time to >> improve one system >> and make sure that system has a future? >> >> Marcus > > And if none of actual forks have all as I wish? > All have some good and all have some problem for me. > It's why try to learn from all here and all in Squeak and from Juan. >
Learning does not mean to be binary compatible. -- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de
