On 15 December 2012 12:31, Janko Mivšek <[email protected]> wrote: > Dne 15. 12. 2012 12:12, piše Igor Stasenko: >> On 15 December 2012 10:27, Janko Mivšek <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Is there any technical reason that the old FileDirectory stuff doesn't >>> stay and work in parallel to a new FileSystem? Maybe in some package >>> marked obsolete. Both use the same plugin and the same primitives, so >>> where is the problem? > >> Yes, there's one big reason: maintainability. And manpower. >> Who would like to maintain FD? Any takers? > > Gain with a (in this case very small) bit of manpower to ease upgrade to > new FS by providing existing FD for a while outweighs the loss by not > doing that. As a professional organization providing a professional > product Pharo should think rather that way. >
Hold on.. Since when Pharo project became professional product? How much money you and others paying for using it? Yes, we position it as a product FOR professionals, but does it automatically makes a professional one? I don't think so. So, why you think that it is correct to put such requirements/expectations it? > Janko > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
