On 2013-02-11, at 16:47, Benjamin Pollack <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013, at 12:47 PM, stephane ducasse wrote: >> thanks a lot ben. >> I'm busy migrating on 10.7 to 10.8 on a new machine and bumping into >> well…. glitches :) >> I will sync with the team monday. > > Good timing! The FogBugz team rolled pharo.fogbugz.com over to the beta > this morning. Each person can opt into or out of the beta individually; > to avoid disrupting you (the account seems very active at the moment), I > did *not* preemptively move everyone. To engage the beta UI, in the > toolbar at the top, you should see a link that says "FogBugz Beta UI is > disabled. [Enable it.]" Click the link, and, after a full-page refresh, > you should notice that suddenly everything runs *much* faster. > Specifically, the new UI speeds up list pages, case/email navigation, > case/email creation, and the search system. indeed looks nice and quite a bit faster ;) > While we think the new version is solid, and have been using it > internally for several months, there may be a bug or two. It's a beta; > that's the point. If you do hit an issue, you should find a link to go > back to the "slow" version in the same location, as well as a feedback > form where you can tell us what we need to fix. > > Again, please feel free to bug me if you have any questions, either on > the list, on IRC (bmp), or directly, and I'll be happy to answer them. > And, if all of you feel like FogBugz just isn't the right tool for > Pharo, that's fine, too. I just wanted you to have it as an option. So far I think it looks good ;). we started implementing the API to work on FogBugz. I guess we will decide this week whether or not to migrate to FogBugz. Am I right that you have a tool to migrate the issues from google code? Otherwise we might look into using our google code API to migrate issues...
