On Feb 11, 2013, at 8:21 PM, Camillo Bruni <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> On 2013-02-11, at 16:47, Benjamin Pollack <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013, at 12:47 PM, stephane ducasse wrote:
>>> thanks a lot ben.
>>> I'm busy migrating on 10.7 to 10.8 on a new machine and bumping into
>>> well…. glitches :)
>>> I will sync with the team monday.
>> 
>> Good timing!  The FogBugz team rolled pharo.fogbugz.com over to the beta
>> this morning.  Each person can opt into or out of the beta individually;
>> to avoid disrupting you (the account seems very active at the moment), I
>> did *not* preemptively move everyone.  To engage the beta UI, in the
>> toolbar at the top, you should see a link that says "FogBugz Beta UI is
>> disabled. [Enable it.]"  Click the link, and, after a full-page refresh,
>> you should notice that suddenly everything runs *much* faster. 
>> Specifically, the new UI speeds up list pages, case/email navigation,
>> case/email creation, and the search system.
> 
> indeed looks nice and quite a bit faster ;)
> 
for me it does not work. It just says "Loading"  with the progress bar,
after a while it adds a link like "Slow, Busted? Go back to old UI"...

This is Safari on MacOS 10.8.2

>> While we think the new version is solid, and have been using it
>> internally for several months, there may be a bug or two.  It's a beta;
>> that's the point.  If you do hit an issue, you should find a link to go
>> back to the "slow" version in the same location, as well as a feedback
>> form where you can tell us what we need to fix.
>> 
>> Again, please feel free to bug me if you have any questions, either on
>> the list, on IRC (bmp), or directly, and I'll be happy to answer them. 
>> And, if all of you feel like FogBugz just isn't the right tool for
>> Pharo, that's fine, too.  I just wanted you to have it as an option.
> 
> So far I think it looks good ;). we started implementing the API to work on 
> FogBugz. I guess we will decide this week whether or not to migrate to 
> FogBugz.
> 
Yes, we should check and then decide. 

        Marcus


Reply via email to