On 14 April 2013 20:33, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote: > > On 14 Apr 2013, at 20:24, Igor Stasenko <siguc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Another strange thing, which i discovered is deferredStartupActions, >> is not empty in my image.. >> >> (you can check it by inspecting Smalltalk variable) >> >> an OrderedCollection([self managedServers >> do: [:each | each start]]) >> >> Sven, please check this. Maybe it is my image.. > > Euh, yes, that is what ZnServer class>>#startUp: does. > There is even a comment. > I don't remember why it is done this way, I guess someone suggested it to me. > Is there anything wrong with that ? > yes. the code by itself looks quite harmless. but i don't understand why deferredStartupActions list is not empty (it should be empty, and stay empty once image finished startup)
>> -- >> Best regards, >> Igor Stasenko. > > -- > Sven Van Caekenberghe > http://stfx.eu > Smalltalk is the Red Pill > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
