On 14 Apr 2013, at 20:36, Igor Stasenko <siguc...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 14 April 2013 20:33, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote: >> >> On 14 Apr 2013, at 20:24, Igor Stasenko <siguc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Another strange thing, which i discovered is deferredStartupActions, >>> is not empty in my image.. >>> >>> (you can check it by inspecting Smalltalk variable) >>> >>> an OrderedCollection([self managedServers >>> do: [:each | each start]]) >>> >>> Sven, please check this. Maybe it is my image.. >> >> Euh, yes, that is what ZnServer class>>#startUp: does. >> There is even a comment. >> I don't remember why it is done this way, I guess someone suggested it to me. >> Is there anything wrong with that ? >> > yes. the code by itself looks quite harmless. > but i don't understand why deferredStartupActions list is not empty > (it should be empty, and stay empty once image finished startup)
OK, you mean that once a deferred action is executed, it should be removed from the list. If the list is not empty, that seems like an internal problem. >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> Igor Stasenko. >> >> -- >> Sven Van Caekenberghe >> http://stfx.eu >> Smalltalk is the Red Pill >> >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko. >
