On 14 April 2013 20:41, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote: > > On 14 Apr 2013, at 20:36, Igor Stasenko <siguc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 14 April 2013 20:33, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote: >>> >>> On 14 Apr 2013, at 20:24, Igor Stasenko <siguc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Another strange thing, which i discovered is deferredStartupActions, >>>> is not empty in my image.. >>>> >>>> (you can check it by inspecting Smalltalk variable) >>>> >>>> an OrderedCollection([self managedServers >>>> do: [:each | each start]]) >>>> >>>> Sven, please check this. Maybe it is my image.. >>> >>> Euh, yes, that is what ZnServer class>>#startUp: does. >>> There is even a comment. >>> I don't remember why it is done this way, I guess someone suggested it to >>> me. >>> Is there anything wrong with that ? >>> >> yes. the code by itself looks quite harmless. >> but i don't understand why deferredStartupActions list is not empty >> (it should be empty, and stay empty once image finished startup) > > OK, you mean that once a deferred action is executed, it should be removed > from the list. > If the list is not empty, that seems like an internal problem. > it seems so.. because nothing cleaning it after.. in #executeDeferredStartupActions:
(https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?10287) -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
