Hi Marcus
Ok, that makes it certain that I really have
to move my packages to newer images
if I want to sustain through the years,
doesn't it?
Regards
Ted

On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On May 2, 2011, at 6:49 PM, Ted F.A. van Gaalen wrote:
>
>> Hi All instances of HumanBeing
>>
>> Then, another question remains:
>>
>> Will my image of 2011 still work correctly
>> on the VM of AD 2019 (the ones that than probably
>> run on Ubuntu 2019.10, Windows11 and AppleOS/X 2019)?
>> or the VM created for a newly emerged computer system?
>>
> If I can guarantee one thing, than it is this: the VM of 2019
> (that I will use) will *not* be compatible to todays images.
>
> Because, this would mean this:
>
>        1) No 64bit. *Ever*. We would be 32 bit forever, even on your
>             iPhone of 2019 with 128GB if RAM.
>        2) No better GC. *EVER*.
>        3) No support for good hashes.
>        4) No nothing. (multiple tag bits, immutatble objects...)
>        5) No support for more than one CPU, ever.
> ... this list is very long.
>
> And it would mean that we could never clean up the VM and simplify
> it. We would need to stay compatible to BitBlt from 1978 in 2018.
> Does that make sense? Do *you* want to maintain a backward compatible
> Balloon Pluging in 2015?
>
> Pharo is not relevant today. (I actually think it's not.). Now
> if we *require* to *never* change the VM, then this guarantees
> complete uselessness very soon.
>
> Do you really want to make any progress on the VM side impossible?
>
>        Marcus
>
>
> --
> Marcus Denker  -- http://www.marcusdenker.de
> INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
>
>
>

Reply via email to