Yes, the distinction is blurred, i am good with OOP but won't dive too deep (i might drown :o)
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:34 PM, TedvG TedvG <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, but a bit simplified: > As a "typical application programmer" > I consider myself as a "pharo-user" > (that is why I am here.) > Pharo/Smalltalk I really like as an application development tool. > made by people like you (grateful, thanks), who dive > deeper in Pharo "itself", so to speak > So that is why I come with typical "user" questions > and long term thoughts about usability and so on. > Simply said: I wont' touch much of the "deeper world" > in the image, but put my own application object layer > on it. That is so nice about Smalltalk. > (not making any money with it, I am outta work at the moment :o| > > > > - > > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Igor Stasenko <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 2 May 2011 22:59, Ted F.A. van Gaalen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Igor >>> ?? Shouldn't I be writing >>> Pharo/Seaside apps with it? >>> I am definitely a *user* Of Pharo/Seaside if I do.. >> >> hmm.. i don't know.. i were always thinking that those who writing >> applications are developers, >> and those who using applications, who don't understand what program >> is, what is the code, and how it works are users.. >> but maybe times had changed and now writing an application no longer >> means that you are developer, >> but just some kind of power-user? :) >> >>> Regards >>> Ted >>> >>> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Ramon Leon <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>> El lun, 02-05-2011 a las 22:43 +0200, Igor Stasenko escribió: >>>>>> >>>>>> Pharo is end-user application for developers, not for users :) >>>> >>>> +1, that's why I prefer Pharo over Squeak. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ramon Leon >>>> http://onsmalltalk.com >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Igor Stasenko AKA sig. >> >> >
