On May 14, 2011, at 12:50 PM, Marcus Denker wrote: > > On May 14, 2011, at 8:54 PM, Pat Maddox wrote: >> >> That would be awesome! I was looking at the bug tracker >> (http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list#) yesterday to see if there were >> things that I could help with...but even when looking at "open" issues, many >> of them are several years old, and have a state of "Accepted." So as someone >> not actively involved in pharo development, I have absolutely no clue what >> actually needs to be fixed. >> >> I'd like to help, the bug tracker doesn't give me much guidance (or at least >> I'd benefit from an explanation of how it's structured), and so guidance >> from someone who's active would be really helpful. >> > So the best thing is to just do exactly that: Write that it's unclear what > needs to be done. > > Every Issue on the tracker should have a clear "next action needed to be done > to move this forward" defined. I not, than the next action is to define the > next action.
So what's the deal with these 261 Accepted tickets? Have they been fixed and committed to Pharo? or have they simply been acknowledged as a problem? When viewing open tickets, here are the statuses I see: * Accepted * Comment * FixProposed * FixedWaitingToBePharoed * New * Started I don't really know how to interpret all of them. Anyway, I guess I'll just go down the list for stuff that looks interesting, and ask what needs to be done. Pat
