On May 15, 2011, at 8:07 AM, laurent laffont wrote:

> Another idea is to have the issues list sorted by id desc (most recent on 
> top) instead of older ones on top.

yes but no idea how to do that.

> 
> Laurent.
> 
> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Pat Maddox <[email protected]> wrote:
> On May 14, 2011, at 9:53 AM, laurent laffont wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> I try to solve some issue in the issues tracker from time to time, but
>> it's often difficult
>> when outside your expertise. So doing it with others might definitively help.
>> 
>> 
>> Fix of the day contest has the advantage of being compatible with every 
>> people timezone / agenda.
>> 
>> We can also synchronize CODTC and FOTDC in order to comment classes related 
>> to the fix.
>> 
>> Now we just need someone to lead the FOTDC. I already do COTDC so is there a 
>> good soul ?
>> 
>> 
>> well, I've started by renaming the thread and attaching Pharo-users.
>> 
>> Laurent, maybe you should clarify what "lead"  exactly means. 
>> 
>> 
>> Everyday:
>> - choose an issue for the contest
>> - write it to the mailing list
>> - push to ask help 
>> - contest is done when a slice is put in inbox
>> 
>> 
>> Indeed, much like COTDC is.
>> 
>> Laurent. 
> 
> That would be awesome! I was looking at the bug tracker 
> (http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list#) yesterday to see if there were 
> things that I could help with...but even when looking at "open" issues, many 
> of them are several years old, and have a state of "Accepted." So as someone 
> not actively involved in pharo development, I have absolutely no clue what 
> actually needs to be fixed.
> 
> I'd like to help, the bug tracker doesn't give me much guidance (or at least 
> I'd benefit from an explanation of how it's structured), and so guidance from 
> someone who's active would be really helpful.
> 
> 
> You can also check those tagged as milestone 1.3 which means that they 
> "should" be more or less new.
> http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list?can=2&q=Milestone%3D1.3+&colspec=ID+Type+Status+Summary+Milestone+Difficulty&cells=tiles
> 
> cheers
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mariano
> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
> 
> 


Reply via email to