On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Pat Maddox <[email protected]> wrote:
> On May 14, 2011, at 12:50 PM, Marcus Denker wrote: > > > > > On May 14, 2011, at 8:54 PM, Pat Maddox wrote: > >> > >> That would be awesome! I was looking at the bug tracker ( > http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list#) yesterday to see if there > were things that I could help with...but even when looking at "open" issues, > many of them are several years old, and have a state of "Accepted." So as > someone not actively involved in pharo development, I have absolutely no > clue what actually needs to be fixed. > >> > >> I'd like to help, the bug tracker doesn't give me much guidance (or at > least I'd benefit from an explanation of how it's structured), and so > guidance from someone who's active would be really helpful. > >> > > So the best thing is to just do exactly that: Write that it's unclear > what needs to be done. > > > > Every Issue on the tracker should have a clear "next action needed to be > done to move this forward" defined. I not, than the next action is to define > the next action. > > So what's the deal with these 261 Accepted tickets? Have they been fixed > and committed to Pharo? or have they simply been acknowledged as a problem? > > When viewing open tickets, here are the statuses I see: > * Accepted > * Comment > * FixProposed > * FixedWaitingToBePharoed > * New > * Started > > I don't really know how to interpret all of them. > See screenshot. Laurent. > > Anyway, I guess I'll just go down the list for stuff that looks > interesting, and ask what needs to be done. > > Pat > >
<<attachment: statuses.png>>
